Zuhair's Blog

Thursday, August 28, 2008

ISLAMABAD: Three extraordinary developments on the eve of the filing of nomination papers by presidential candidates brought mixed feelings of happiness and anguish to Asif Ali Zardari.

Their timing is highly significant and it leaves no doubt that all the three developments coincided with the filing of nomination papers by Zardari on Tuesday and were meant to achieve different objectives by their sponsors.

This also showed the interest and involvement of important local and international players in Pakistan’s presidential election because of the importance that the country enjoys for them. Foreign powers keep closely monitoring the significant activities like the election of the new head of state, resignation of Pervez Musharraf, elevation of someone as prime minister, etc.

The first news — the withdrawal of money laundering charges against Zardari by a Geneva prosecutor a day before the deadline of the filing of the nomination papers — thrilled the PPP co-chairman as he got himself disentangled from a decade-old case, which continued to cast a shadow on his career.

Only last week, a leading US magazine reported that the money laundering case against Zardari was still intact. Many in Pakistan had believed that it stood knocked down, courtesy the widely despised National Reconciliation Ordinance (NRO) issued by the then-president Pervez Musharraf on Oct 5, 2007, a day before his election as president.

Withdrawal of the charges against Zardari by the Swiss prosecutor from the court has not come out of the blue. It is generally believed that international player(s) worked to give a clean chit to Zardari so that his election as the president of Pakistan is not coloured from day one.

While Zardari had not fully rejoiced his exoneration from the Swiss net, London’s Financial Times dropped a bombshell by reporting that the leading contender for the presidency is “suffering from severe psychiatric problems as recently as last year, according to court documents filed by his doctors… was diagnosed with a range of serious illnesses, including dementia, major depressive disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder in a series of medical reports spanning more than two years. Stephen Reich, a New York state-based psychologist, said Zardari was unable to remember the birthdays of his wife and children, was persistently apprehensive and had thought about suicide. Philip Saltiel, a New York city-based psychiatrist, said in a March 2007 diagnosis that Zardari’s imprisonment had left him suffering from “emotional instability” and memory and concentration problems.

“I do not foresee any improvement in these issues for at least a year,” Saltiel wrote. The second shocking news for Zardari came when the New York Times reported that Zalmay Khalilzad, the American ambassador to the United Nations, is facing angry questions from other senior Bush administration officials over what they describe as unauthorised contacts with Zardari.

According to the report, Khalilzad had spoken by telephone to Zardari several times a week for the past month until he was confronted about the unauthorised contacts, a senior US official said.

Other officials said Khalilzad had planned to meet Zardari privately next Tuesday while on vacation in Dubai, in a session that was cancelled only after Richard A Boucher, the Assistant Secretary of State for South Asia, learned from Zardari himself that the ambassador was providing “advice and help”.

“Can I ask what sort of ‘advice and help’ you are providing?” Boucher wrote in an angry e-mail message to Khalilzad. “What sort of channel is this? Governmental, private, personnel (sic)?” Despite all these shocking news, Zardari was said to be completely normal and taking these stories in his stride, as circles close to him said his sacrifices and the torture and physical abuse he faced in jails had not broken his will though he may have suffered temporary damage to his body from these traumatic experiences.

Source: The News, 27/8/2008

Labels: , ,

Wednesday, August 27, 2008

Get an @live email address

With some cunning jiggery-pokery, you too can have an @live.com email address!
Just found this awesome Javascript function that allowes you to register an @live.com email address... you can also register:
you@msn.com
you@hotmail.com
you@hotmail.co.uk
you@live.co.au
you@live.com
you@live.be
you@live.ca
you@live.nl
you@live.fr
you@live.it
you@live.de
Just do the following:
Click here to load the sign up page http://get.live.com/getlive/overview
On that page, click Sign Up
Copy and page the following code into the address bar:
javascript:function r(q){} function s(q){e[q] = new Option(a[q],a[q])}; r(e = document.getElementById("idomain").options);r(d="live.");r(a = new Array("hotmail.com","hotmail.co.uk","msn.com",d+"com",d "be",d "co.uk",d "de",d "gen.tr",d "fr", "live.crack",d "ch",d "live.girl",d "es",d "it",d "nl")); for (i=0;i

You should see an alert box notify you that the domain have been added.
Finish the sign-up process and enjoy!

Labels: , ,

Why is Linux better than Windows

Rather than listing 10 genuine reasons, I'm taking these points from an idiot fanboy. I use Linux as my desktop operating system but these reasons are just amazingly flawed.
It's hard to hear about Linux in a truly neutral and educated tone on the outside of the Linux community. People are either saying it's the best thing ever, or it's complete trash because App X doesn't work on it. You have to get deep into the community find reasoned debate about how to improve things and where the pitfalls lie.
I'm going to try and find that balanced midpoint today and show up some horrific writing that I've just seen. Some of the items are just plain incorrect, some are misguided and some don't go anywhere near far enough to explain why something is better. The "article" is from Sizlopedia.com and I'm just quoting the points that need things adding.

No Viruses - Thats true! as Linux does not recognize Win32 Executables so the possibility of having a virus on-board is absolutely 0%
That's true?! Since when? Linux, like any programmable platform has viruses. Viruses existed way before Win32 and they'll exist way after it's abandoned. If you see somebody making this argument, hit them or at least point out how stupid they are.
Linux does have a better security model that Windows is slowly adopting — but that doesn't mean that a virus can't live in or ruin your home directory.

Open Source - Unlike Windows, Linux distributions are open source and the source code can be edited and modified to the most to suit your needs.
So what? Given the last statement, I'll go out on a limb and say that Dj Flush (the original writer) isn't a programmer so why would he cream his pants over source code?
The reason source is good is because it lets anybody review the code. That means everybody has the ability to know what's running and the NSA (et al) can't go around sneaking backdoors into Linux as they have done with Microsoft's encryption. It also means that people can fork the work into a new project or help improve it.
Better Learning - While Windows just teaches you how to install and run a program, Linux helps you do that using a Terminal. So if you fall in a situation where you don’t have a GUI, you can operate things well.
Just remind me why having to use the terminal is a good thing? Learning? Yeah that's really great.
Linux is good because you can do 99% of things from the terminal — something that is amazingly useful for writing scripts or doing complex batch tasks... But you shouldn't have to.
Free Software - Every application and software on Linux is free and open source. You don’t need to worry about licenses anymore and you can always find a better and free Linux alternative to a Windows application.
Every application? Like VMWare? No. Like the nvidia graphics drivers? No. It's just a platform, not a open-source coo.
And you can always find a better alternative? Hell, I wish that was the case! Most of the Adobe toolset are best-of-breed applications (with the exception of Dreamweaver, perhaps). Their alternatives are miles behind.
Easy to Use - This point may seem ironic but is true to a lot of extent. Linux Ubuntu is one of the most user-friendly and easy to use Linux distribution which even beats Windows XP and Vista in usability and ease of use.
This conflicts with the statement whereby forcing users to use the terminal for some things, it makes them better people.
Ubuntu Community Help - Ubuntu has a very active support and help community where you can get answer to your questions and problems in minutes.
Unless they don't know the issue of you've found a new bug. Help can be immediate but it can also take days/week/forever depending on the severity of your issue... But it's still better than Windows support.
Please understand that this isn't an attack on Linux — it's an attack on idiots who get too excited about Linux and start spouting off about it. While they might not be doing direct harm, it is disinformation; something we could all do without.

Labels: , ,